THE BASIC PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETING PREAMBLES OF CONSTITUTIONS

Filip Novaković, Aleksej Indžić

Abstract


In this article, we touch on the preambles of constitutions, their importance, and manner of interpretation with a purposeful analysis of these issues as the main objective of this paper. We look at constitutional law in its entirety, as well as preambular issues, to evaluate the segments of the legal act that represent its non-normative part. To significantly contribute to the understanding of the very goal of the constitution and similar acts is the most important issue of this topic. By analysing different methods of interpreting the constitution and its preamble, we provide a comprehensive account of errors in interpreting the constitution that penetrate every segment of our lives.

Keywords


interpretation of law; preamble; originalism; theory of law; constitution; constitutional law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beinoravičius, D., Mesonis, G., & Vainiute, M. (2015). The role and place of preamble in Lithuanian constitutional regulation. Baltic Journal of Law and Politics, 8(2), 136-158.

Blagojević, B. (1939). Tumačenje izuzetaka. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 5-6/1939.

Blagojević, S. (1997). Metodologija prava. Službeni list SRJ.

Bobbio, N. (1974). Il preambolo della Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo, in Rivista di diritto internazionale.

Bouvier, J. (1868). A Law Dictionary. George W. Childs.

Boyce, B. (1996). Originalism and the Fourteenth Amendmant. Wake Forest Law Review, 33(4), 909-1026.

Chemerinsky, E. (2001). Getting Beyond Formalism in Constitutional Law: Constitutional Theory Matters. Oklahoma Law Review, 54(1), 1-16.

Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrived from http://www.ohr.int/ohr-dept/legal/laws-of-bih/pdf/001%20-%20Constitutions/BH/BH%20CONSTITUTION%20.pdf.

Constitution of the Syrian Arab Republic. Retrived from https://www.refworld.org/docid/5100f02a2.html.

Dewey, J. (1960). Logical Method and Law. In R. D. Henson (Ed.), Landmarks of Law, Highlights of Legal Opinion (pp. 117-126). Harper and Brothers Publishers.

District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).

Đorđević, J. (1980). Politički system. Savremena administracija.

Đorđević, J. (1977). Ustavno pravo. Savremena administracija.

Dred Scott v. John F. A. Stanford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).

Duguit, L. (2007). Mannuel de droit constitutionnel. Paris: LGDJ.

Fira, A. (2002). Enciklopedija ustavnog prava bivših jugoslovenskih zemalja, Tom IV, Ustavno pravo Bosne i Hercegovine. SANU i Agencija „Mir“.

France’s Constitution of 1958 with Amendments trough. Retrived from https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/France_2008.pdf?lang=en.

Frosini, J. O. (2012). Constitutional Preambles, At a Crossroads between Politics and Law. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli.

Gadamer, H. G. (1978). Istina i metoda, osnovi filozofske hermeneutikeVeselin Masleša.

Ginsburg, T., Rockmore, D., & Foti, N. (2014). We the People: A Global Origins of the Constitutional Preambles. George Washington International Law Review, 46(2), 101-136.

Haberle, P. (2002). Ustavna država. Politička kultura.

Harašić, Ž. (2011). Viskovićeva teorija tumačenja u pravu. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 48(1), 57-72.

Harašić, Ž. (2015). More About Teleological Argumentation in Law. Pravni vjesnik, 31(3-4), 23-49.

Hasanbegović, J. (1988). Perelmanova pravna logika kao nova retorika. Izdavačko-istraživački centar SSO Srbije.

Hirsch, E. D. (1967). Validity in Interpretation. Yale University Press.

Home Building and Loan Assoc. v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (1934).

Jovičić, J. (1977). O ustavu. Savremena administracija.

Kelzen, H. (1998). Opšta teorija prava i države. Pravni fakultet Univeziteta u Beogradu.

Košutić, B. P. (2008). Uvod u jurisprudenciju. CID.

Kutlešić, V. (2010). Preambule ustava – uporedna studija 194 važeća ustava. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2, 60-76.

Kuzmanović, R. (2000). Osnovi ustavnog sistema Sjedninjenih Američkih Država (sudski sistem). Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci.

Kuzmanović, R. (2002). Ustavno pravo. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci.

Kuzmanović, R. (2007). Suprematija ustava nad ostalim pravnim aktima. Pravna riječ, Časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu, 10/2007, 11-24.

Lombardi, G. Tumačenje ustava. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, 1/1985.

Lukić, R., Košutić, B. (2003). Uvod u pravo. Službeni list SRJ.

Marković, R. (2015) Ustavno pravo. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819).

Mikić, (2014). Funkcije premabula savremenih ustava. Pravni zapisi, 2/2014, 432-447.

Murill, B. J. (2018). Modes of Constitutional Interpretation. Congressional Researh Service.

Orgad, L. (2010). The preamble in constitutional interpretation. International Journal of Constituional Law, 8(4), 714-738.

Orlović, S. (2019). Ustavno pravo. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.

Partial Decision I of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Case U-5/98-I of 29 January 2000.

Partial Decision II of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Case U-5/98-II of 18 February 2000.

Partial Decision III of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Case U-5/98-III of 1 July 2000.

Patterson, E. W. (1960). Logic in the Law. In R. D. Henson (Ed.), Landmarks of Law, Highlights of Legal Opinion (pp. 127-157). Harper and Brothers Publishers.

Perić, B. (1968). Struktura prava. Narodne novine.

Petrov, V. (2009). Svojstva i funkcije modernog ustava. Pravna riječ, Časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu, 18/2009, 235-245.

Popović, M. (1997). Prilozi teoriji prava. Beograd: Službeni list SRJ.

Post, R. (1990). Theories of Constitutional Interpretation. Representations, 30, 13-41.

Radovanović, S. (2020). Pravni značaj preambule (sa posebnim osvrtom na ustavno-pravni značaj). Megatrend revija, 17(2), 95-108.

Roach, K. (2001). The Use and Audiences of Preambles in Legislation. McGill Law Journal, 47, 129-159.

Rousseau, D. (2006). Droit du contentieux constitutionnel. LGDJ.

Savić, S. (1996-1997). Zakon kao izvor prava u pravnom sistemu Republike Srpske. Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci, 20-21, 93-104.

Savić, S. (2000). Konstitutivnost naroda u Bosni i Hercegovini. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci.

Savić, S. (2008). Osnove prava. Comesgrafica.

Savić, S. (2011). Preambula Ustava Bosne i Hercegovine. Pravna riječ, Časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu, 27/2011, 23-38.

Savić, S. (2017). Tumačenje ustava. Pravna riječ, Časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu, 50/2017, 11-32.

Scalia, A. (1997). A Matter of Interpretation. Princeton University Press.

Simović, D. (2020). O pravnoj prirodi preambule ustava. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, LIX(87), 15-36.

Simović, D., Petrov, V. (2018). Ustavno pravo. Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet.

Stepanov, R., Despotović, Lj. (2004). Uvod u jurisprudenciju – osnovni pojmovi sistematike, teorije i sociologije pravaStylos.

Stojanović, D. (2007). Ustavno pravo. Sven.

Stojanović, D. M. (2005). Ustavno pravo, Knjiga I. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu.

Tasić, Đ. (1984). Izbor rasprava i članaka iz teorije prava. SANU.

Thomas, K. R. (2011). Selected Theories of Constitutional Interpretation. Congressional Research Service.

Tracz, E. T. (2020). Towards a Premble-Based Theory of Constitutional Interpretation. Gonzaga Law Review, 56(1), 95-115.

Trnka, K. (2006). Ustavno pravo. Fakultet za javnu upravu.

Vasić, R., Čavoki, K. (1999). Uvod u pravo II. Izdavačka kuća „Draganić“.

Vedel, G. (2002). Manuel élémentaire de droit constitutionnel. Paris: Dalloz.

Vehabović, F. (2006). Odnos Ustava Bosne i Hercegovine i Evropske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda. ACIPS.

Vienna Convention on the Law of International Treaties. Retrived from https://www.oas.org/legal/english/docs/Vienna%20Convention%20Treaties.htm.

Visković, N. (1981). O tumačenju pravnih akata. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu (u spomen prof. Olegu mandiću), 3-4, 369-390.

Voermans, W., Stremler, M., Cliteur, P. (2017). Constitutional Preambles: A Comparative Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Vrban, D. (2003). Država i pravo. Golden Marketing.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21533/epiphany.v15i1.386

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Epiphany

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Epiphany (pISSN 2303-6850, eISSN 1840-3719) is currently Indexed/Abstracted